| TV16 | R Documentation |
The Individual Correlates of the Trump Vote in 2016
Description
These data come from the 2016 CCES and allow interested students to model the individual correlates of the Trump vote in 2016. Code/analysis heavily indebted to a 2017 analysis I did on my blog (see references).
Usage
TV16
Format
A data frame with 64600 observations on the following 21 variables.
uida numeric vector, a unique identifier for the respondent as they first appear in the CCES data.
statea character vector for the state in which the respondent resides
votetrumpa numeric that equals 1 if the respondent voted says s/he voted for Trump in 2016.
agea numeric vector for age that is roughly calculated as 2016 -
birthyr, as it's coded in the CCES data.femalea numeric that equals 1 if the respondent is a woman
collegeeda numeric vector that equals 1 if the respondent says s/he has a college degree
racefa character vector for the race of the respondent
famincra numeric vector for the respondent's household income. Ranges from 1 (Less than $10,000) to 12 ($150,000 or more).
ideoa numeric vector for the respondent's ideology on a liberal-conservative discrete scale. 1 = very liberal. 5 = very conservative.
pid7naa numeric vector for the respondent's partisanship on the familiar 1-7 scale. 1 = Strong Democrat. 7 = Strong Republican. Other party supporters (e.g. libertarians) are coded as NA.
bornagaina numeric vector for whether the respondent self-identifies as a born-again Christian.
religimpa numeric vector for the importance of religion to the respondent. 1 = not at all important. 4 = very important.
churchatda numeric vector for the extent of church attendance for the respondent. 1 = never. 6 = more than once a week.
prayerfreqa numeric vector for the frequency of prayer for the respondent. 1 = never. 7 = several times a day.
angryracisma numeric vector for how angry the respondent is that racism exists. 1 = strongly agree (i.e. is angry racism exists). 5 = strongly disagree.
whiteadva numeric vector for agreement with statement that white people have advantages over others in the U.S. 1 = strongly agree. 5 = strongly disagree.
fearracesa numeric vector for agreement with statement that the respondent fears other races. 1 = strongly disagree. 5 = strongly agree.
racerarea numeric vector for agreement with statement that racism is rare in the U.S. 1 = strongly disagree. 5 = strongly agree.
lreliga numeric vector that serves as a latent estimate for religiosity from the
bornagain,religimp,churchatd, andprayerfreqvariables. Higher values = more religiosity.lcograca numeric vector that serves as a latent estimate for cognitive racism. This is derived from the
racerareandwhiteadvvariables.lempraca numeric vector that serves as a latent estimate for empathetic racism. This is derived from the
fearracesandangryracismvariables.
Details
The latent estimates for religiosity, cognitive racism, and empathetic
racism come from a graded response model estimated in mirt. The concepts of
"cognitive racism" and "empathetic racism" come from DeSante and Smith.
Source
Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2016
References
https://svmiller.com/blog/2017/04/age-income-racism-partisanship-trump-vote-2016/
https://github.com/svmiller/2016-cces-trump-vote/blob/master/1-2016-cces-trump.R